[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <322ab57d-05d8-72b9-9580-0579b5d8b468@hisilicon.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 16:59:56 +0800
From: Junxian Huang <huangjunxian6@...ilicon.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC: <jgg@...pe.ca>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>, <linuxarm@...wei.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 0/2] RDMA/hns: Support configuring congestion
control algorithm with QP granularity
On 2024/2/7 16:33, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 11:29:08AM +0800, Junxian Huang wrote:
>> Patch #1 reverts a previous bugfix that was intended to add restriction
>> to congestion control algorithm for UD but mistakenly introduced other
>> problem.
>
> First patch shouldn't be revert but a fix to "add a restriction that only DCQCN
> is supported for UD." and second patch should be a new feature.
>
> Thanks
>
OK, but I have two questions here:
1. Of course we can not only revert but also completely fix the bug in patch #1.
But since we are adding a new feature that can also fix this bug in patch #2,
the fix in patch #1 will be immediately removed in patch #2. Is this acceptable?
2. Should I still put these two patches into one patchset in the next version, or
seperate them into two individual patchset?
Thanks,
Junxian
>>
>> Patch #2 adds support for configuring congestion control algorithm with
>> QP granularity. The algorithm restriction for UD is added in this patch.
>>
>> Junxian Huang (1):
>> RDMA/hns: Support configuring congestion control algorithm with QP
>> granularity
>>
>> Luoyouming (1):
>> Revert "RDMA/hns: The UD mode can only be configured with DCQCN"
>>
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h | 26 +++++---
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c | 18 ++----
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.h | 3 +-
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c | 3 +
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h | 17 +++++
>> 6 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.30.0
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists