linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH for-next 0/2] RDMA/hns: Support configuring congestion control algorithm with QP granularity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 10:10:25 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Junxian Huang <huangjunxian6@...ilicon.com>
Cc: jgg@...pe.ca, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...wei.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 0/2] RDMA/hns: Support configuring congestion
 control algorithm with QP granularity

On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 04:59:56PM +0800, Junxian Huang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2024/2/7 16:33, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 11:29:08AM +0800, Junxian Huang wrote:
> >> Patch #1 reverts a previous bugfix that was intended to add restriction
> >> to congestion control algorithm for UD but mistakenly introduced other
> >> problem.
> > 
> > First patch shouldn't be revert but a fix to "add a restriction that only DCQCN
> > is supported for UD." and second patch should be a new feature.
> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> 
> OK, but I have two questions here:
> 
> 1. Of course we can not only revert but also completely fix the bug in patch #1.
>    But since we are adding a new feature that can also fix this bug in patch #2,
>    the fix in patch #1 will be immediately removed in patch #2. Is this acceptable?

I would expect that second patch will extend the first one and not remove.

> 
> 2. Should I still put these two patches into one patchset in the next version, or
>    seperate them into two individual patchset?

Better to separate, as we will take fix faster than new feature.

Thanks

> 
> Thanks,
> Junxian
> 
> >>
> >> Patch #2 adds support for configuring congestion control algorithm with
> >> QP granularity. The algorithm restriction for UD is added in this patch.
> >>
> >> Junxian Huang (1):
> >>   RDMA/hns: Support configuring congestion control algorithm with QP
> >>     granularity
> >>
> >> Luoyouming (1):
> >>   Revert "RDMA/hns: The UD mode can only be configured with DCQCN"
> >>
> >>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_device.h | 26 +++++---
> >>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.c  | 18 ++----
> >>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_hw_v2.h  |  3 +-
> >>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_main.c   |  3 +
> >>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_qp.c     | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  include/uapi/rdma/hns-abi.h                 | 17 +++++
> >>  6 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.30.0
> >>
> >