linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64/sve: Document that __SVE_VQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 15:10:28 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64/sve: Document that __SVE_VQ_MAX is much larger
 than needed

On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 01:39:13PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:

> How about something along the lines of:

> /*
>  * Yes, this is 512 QUADWORDS.
>  * To help ensure forward portability, this is much larger than the
>  * current maximum value defined by the SVE architecture.
>  * While arrays or static allocations can be sized based on this value,
>  * watch out!  It will waste a surprisingly large amount of memory.
>  * Dynamic sizing based on the actual runtime vector length is likely to
>  * be preferable for most purposes.
>  */

That works for me.  The cost of initialising can also add up in
emulation.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)