[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240208173946.GX689448@google.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 17:39:46 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@...m.it>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] backlight: mp3309c: Allow to use on non-OF
platforms
On Thu, 08 Feb 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 11:34:25AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 01 Feb 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > backlight: mp3309c: Utilise temporary variable for struct device
>
> (1)
>
> > Set no longer applies. Please rebase, thanks.
>
> I got a contradictory messages:
> 1) email that says that all had been applied;
> 2) this email (that tells the complete opposite);
> 3) the repository where the first two were applied.
>
> While you can amend your scripts, I think I need to rebase only the last patch
This is what I assume happened:
1. Attempted to apply the set (as a set)
2. 2 commits applied cleanly
3. The final commit conflicted
4. I sent you a message to say that the set failed to apply
5. *** I forgot to remove the 2 successful patches ***
6. I applied another patch
7. b4 noticed the 2 patches that were applied and thanked you for them
8. *** I didn't notice that those tys were sent ***
No need to update the scripts. :)
> (1) that may not be found in your tree currently.
I'm going to remove the other ones now. Please submit the set.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists