lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 20:07:33 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@...m.it>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] backlight: mp3309c: Allow to use on non-OF
 platforms

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 05:39:46PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Feb 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 11:34:25AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 01 Feb 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

..

> > > >   backlight: mp3309c: Utilise temporary variable for struct device
> > 
> > (1)
> > 
> > > Set no longer applies.  Please rebase, thanks.
> > 
> > I got a contradictory messages:
> > 1) email that says that all had been applied;
> > 2) this email (that tells the complete opposite);
> > 3) the repository where the first two were applied.
> > 
> > While you can amend your scripts, I think I need to rebase only the last patch
> 
> This is what I assume happened:
> 
> 1. Attempted to apply the set (as a set)
> 2. 2 commits applied cleanly
> 3. The final commit conflicted

Which is really strange. I have just applied (with b4) on top of your changes
and no complains so far.

$ git am ./v2_20240201_andriy_shevchenko_backlight_mp3309c_allow_to_use_on_non_of_platforms.mbx
Applying: backlight: mp3309c: Make use of device properties
Applying: backlight: mp3309c: use dev_err_probe() instead of dev_err()
Applying: backlight: mp3309c: Utilise temporary variable for struct device

Can you show what b4 tells you about this?

> 4. I sent you a message to say that the set failed to apply
> 5. *** I forgot to remove the 2 successful patches ***
> 6. I applied another patch
> 7. b4 noticed the 2 patches that were applied and thanked you for them
> 8. *** I didn't notice that those tys were sent ***
> 
> No need to update the scripts. :)
> 
> > (1) that may not be found in your tree currently.
> 
> I'm going to remove the other ones now.  Please submit the set.

I'll do, but I want to understand better what's going on.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ