[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZcUYZRDVmHhKQu9j@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 20:07:33 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc: Flavio Suligoi <f.suligoi@...m.it>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] backlight: mp3309c: Allow to use on non-OF
platforms
On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 05:39:46PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Feb 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 11:34:25AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 01 Feb 2024, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
..
> > > > backlight: mp3309c: Utilise temporary variable for struct device
> >
> > (1)
> >
> > > Set no longer applies. Please rebase, thanks.
> >
> > I got a contradictory messages:
> > 1) email that says that all had been applied;
> > 2) this email (that tells the complete opposite);
> > 3) the repository where the first two were applied.
> >
> > While you can amend your scripts, I think I need to rebase only the last patch
>
> This is what I assume happened:
>
> 1. Attempted to apply the set (as a set)
> 2. 2 commits applied cleanly
> 3. The final commit conflicted
Which is really strange. I have just applied (with b4) on top of your changes
and no complains so far.
$ git am ./v2_20240201_andriy_shevchenko_backlight_mp3309c_allow_to_use_on_non_of_platforms.mbx
Applying: backlight: mp3309c: Make use of device properties
Applying: backlight: mp3309c: use dev_err_probe() instead of dev_err()
Applying: backlight: mp3309c: Utilise temporary variable for struct device
Can you show what b4 tells you about this?
> 4. I sent you a message to say that the set failed to apply
> 5. *** I forgot to remove the 2 successful patches ***
> 6. I applied another patch
> 7. b4 noticed the 2 patches that were applied and thanked you for them
> 8. *** I didn't notice that those tys were sent ***
>
> No need to update the scripts. :)
>
> > (1) that may not be found in your tree currently.
>
> I'm going to remove the other ones now. Please submit the set.
I'll do, but I want to understand better what's going on.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists