linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] dt-bindings: iio: light: Avago APDS9306

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240208-chaplain-empathy-3955eabb7152@spud>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 18:52:23 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Subhajit Ghosh <subhajit.ghosh@...aklogic.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Anshul Dalal <anshulusr@...il.com>,
	Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
	Matt Ranostay <matt@...ostay.sg>,
	Stefan Windfeldt-Prytz <stefan.windfeldt-prytz@...s.com>,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] dt-bindings: iio: light: Avago APDS9306

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 09:21:17PM +1030, Subhajit Ghosh wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On 8/2/24 18:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 06/02/2024 14:00, Subhajit Ghosh wrote:
> > > Driver support for Avago (Broadcom) APDS9306 Ambient Light Sensor.
> > > Extend avago,apds9300.yaml schema file to support apds9306 device.
> > > 
> > > this patch depends on patch:
> > > "dt-bindings: iio: light: adps9300: Update interrupt definitions"
> > 
> > Drop the paragraph, not helping. There is no dependency here.
> In the submitting patches guide, I read that if one patch depends
> on another, it should be mentioned.
> If I try to apply this patch with "git am", it fails without
> first applying the patch dependency mentioned above. Is that fine?
> Again, sorry about the silly questions, just don't want to assume stuff!

It's another patch in the same series, I don't think you should bother
mentioning this at all. If there's a dependency on another series, then
you should mention it under the --- line.

Cheers,
Conor.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)