[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <646293de-608c-497f-9beb-d5da38b3cd3a@efficios.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 17:16:39 -0500
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...nel.org>, Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] nvdimm/pmem: Fix leak on dax_add_host() failure
On 2024-02-08 17:12, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 17:04:52 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
[...]
>> Should I keep this patch 01/12 within the series for v5 or should I
>> send it separately ?
>
> Doesn't matter much, but perfectionism does say "standalone patch please".
Will do. I plan to add the following statement to the commit message
to make it clear that there is a dependency between the patch series
and this fix:
[ Based on commit "nvdimm/pmem: Fix leak on dax_add_host() failure". ]
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists