[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240208070529.28562-6-raag.jadav@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 12:35:29 +0530
From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
To: u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
lakshmi.sowjanya.d@...el.com
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] pwm: dwc: use pm_sleep_ptr() macro
Since we don't have runtime PM handles here, we should be using
pm_sleep_ptr() macro, so that the compiler can discard it in case
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP=n.
Fixes: 30b5b066fa83 ("pwm: dwc: Use DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS for PM functions")
Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c
index cc5bba977f47..bb39cc34f895 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-dwc.c
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ static struct pci_driver dwc_pwm_driver = {
.remove = dwc_pwm_remove,
.id_table = dwc_pwm_id_table,
.driver = {
- .pm = pm_ptr(&dwc_pwm_pm_ops),
+ .pm = pm_sleep_ptr(&dwc_pwm_pm_ops),
},
};
--
2.35.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists