[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8c468452-1b00-438a-b634-eeccc35d9a41@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 08:47:12 +0100
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki"
<rjw@...ysocki.net>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Ulf Hansson
<ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, LKML
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Stanislaw Gruszka
<stanislaw.gruszka@...ux.intel.com>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Naohiro.Aota@....com, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PM: sleep: Restore asynchronous device resume
optimization
On 07.02.2024 22:35, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 10:30:58PM +0100, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> ...
>> Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
>> XXX wq_update_node_max_active: wq=events_unbound off_cpu=1 total=3 range=[32, 512] node[0] node_cpus=3 max=512
>> XXX wq_update_node_max_active: wq=events_unbound off_cpu=2 total=2 range=[32, 512] node[0] node_cpus=2 max=512
>> XXX wq_update_node_max_active: wq=events_unbound off_cpu=3 total=1 range=[32, 512] node[0] node_cpus=1 max=512
>> Enabling non-boot CPUs ...
>> XXX wq_update_node_max_active: wq=events_unbound off_cpu=-1 total=2 range=[32, 512] node[0] node_cpus=2 max=512
>> CPU1 is up
>> XXX wq_update_node_max_active: wq=events_unbound off_cpu=-1 total=3 range=[32, 512] node[0] node_cpus=3 max=512
>> CPU2 is up
>> XXX wq_update_node_max_active: wq=events_unbound off_cpu=-1 total=4 range=[32, 512] node[0] node_cpus=4 max=512
>> CPU3 is up
> So, the node max_active does stay at 512. The only pwq which uses min_active
> would be the dfl_pwq but I'm not sure why that'd be being used. Can you
> please post the output of `drgn -v vmlinux tools/workqueue/wq_dump.py`?
I've tried to get drgn running on the test target, but then I've noticed
that it is not possible to run it on ARM 32bit target, as it requires
PROC_KCORE support, which is 'Visible if: PROC_FS [=y] && MMU [=y] &&
!ARM [=y]' for some reasons.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Powered by blists - more mailing lists