[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bab0d763-2907-4412-8075-a7ebb25081c0@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 16:11:50 +0800
From: Wu Bo <wubo.oduw@...il.com>
To: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>, Wu Bo <bo.wu@...o.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "f2fs: stop allocating pinned sections if EAGAIN
happens"
On 2024/2/5 11:54, Chao Yu wrote:
> How about calling f2fs_balance_fs() to double check and make sure
> there is
> enough free space for following allocation.
>
> if (has_not_enough_free_secs(sbi, 0,
> GET_SEC_FROM_SEG(sbi, overprovision_segments(sbi)))) {
> f2fs_down_write(&sbi->gc_lock);
> stat_inc_gc_call_count(sbi, FOREGROUND);
> err = f2fs_gc(sbi, &gc_control);
> if (err == -EAGAIN)
> f2fs_balance_fs(sbi, true);
> if (err && err != -ENODATA)
> goto out_err;
> }
>
> Thanks,
f2fs_balance_fs() here will not change procedure branch and may just
trigger another GC.
I'm afraid this is a bit redundant.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists