lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 21:10:25 +1030
From: Subhajit Ghosh <subhajit.ghosh@...aklogic.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
 Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Anshul Dalal <anshulusr@...il.com>,
 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
Cc: Matt Ranostay <matt@...ostay.sg>,
 Stefan Windfeldt-Prytz <stefan.windfeldt-prytz@...s.com>,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] dt-bindings: iio: light: adps9300: Add property
 vdd-supply

Hi Krzysztof,

On 8/2/24 18:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/02/2024 14:00, Subhajit Ghosh wrote:
>> Add vdd-supply property which is valid and useful for all the
>> devices in this schema.
> 
> Why is it useful? How is it useful? DT describes the hardware, not
> because something is "useful".
I am adding this property based on a previous review:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240121153655.5f734180@jic23-huawei/

Does the below commit message in this context make sense to you?
"Add vdd-supply property for all the devices in this schema."
> 
>>
>> this patch depends on patch:
>> "dt-bindings: iio: light: Merge APDS9300 and APDS9960 schemas"
> 
> This is unrelated and does not make any sense in commit msg. Drop.
Apologies for the silly questions:
What does the "Drop" signify? Are you asking me to drop/delete the above
"...patch depends..." message or does it have any other meaning?

In the next version, do I include the ack tag by Conor for this commit?
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
Thank you for reviewing.
Regards,
Subhajit Ghosh


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ