linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] dt-bindings: iio: light: Avago APDS9306

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f7c18fca-2a85-46b2-a671-2409e662520f@tweaklogic.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 21:21:17 +1030
From: Subhajit Ghosh <subhajit.ghosh@...aklogic.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
 Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
 Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Anshul Dalal <anshulusr@...il.com>,
 Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>
Cc: Matt Ranostay <matt@...ostay.sg>,
 Stefan Windfeldt-Prytz <stefan.windfeldt-prytz@...s.com>,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] dt-bindings: iio: light: Avago APDS9306

Hi Krzysztof,

On 8/2/24 18:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/02/2024 14:00, Subhajit Ghosh wrote:
>> Driver support for Avago (Broadcom) APDS9306 Ambient Light Sensor.
>> Extend avago,apds9300.yaml schema file to support apds9306 device.
>>
>> this patch depends on patch:
>> "dt-bindings: iio: light: adps9300: Update interrupt definitions"
> 
> Drop the paragraph, not helping. There is no dependency here.
In the submitting patches guide, I read that if one patch depends
on another, it should be mentioned.
If I try to apply this patch with "git am", it fails without
first applying the patch dependency mentioned above. Is that fine?
Again, sorry about the silly questions, just don't want to assume stuff!
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
Thank you for reviewing.
Regards,
Subhajit Ghosh