linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8295p: Enable tertiary controller and its 4 USB ports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 10:45:36 +0530
From: Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>
To: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov
	<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
CC: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring
	<robh+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <quic_ppratap@...cinc.com>,
        <quic_jackp@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sa8295p: Enable tertiary controller
 and its 4 USB ports



On 2/9/2024 8:11 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 03:24:45PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 at 14:28, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV
>> <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2/6/2024 5:43 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 at 14:03, Krishna Kurapati <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Enable tertiary controller for SA8295P (based on SC8280XP).
>>>>> Add pinctrl support for usb ports to provide VBUS to connected peripherals.
>>>>
>>>> These are not just pinctrl entries. They hide VBUS regulators. Please
>>>> implement them properly as corresponding vbus regulators.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi Dmitry. Apologies, can you elaborate on your comment. I thought this
>>> implementation was fine as Konrad reviewed it in v13 [1]. I removed his
>>> RB tag as I made one change of dropping "_state" in labels.
>>
>> My comment is pretty simple: if I'm not mistaken, your DT doesn't
>> reflect your hardware design.
>> You have actual VBUS regulators driven by these GPIO pins. Is this correct?
>> If so, you should describe them properly in the device tree rather
>> than describing them just as USB host's pinctrl state.
>>
> 
> This is correct, these gpios are wired to the enable-pin of a set of
> regulators providing the VBUS voltage. Please, Krishna, represent them
> as always-on fixed-regulators instead.
> 
Hi Dmitry, Krzysztof, Bjorn,

  Thanks for the review on this patch. Will convert the pinctrl DT's to 
regulator entries.

Regards,
Krishna,