linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: usb: microchip,usb5744: Remove peer-hub as requirement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZcXfflAvkzHzWBfb@eichest-laptop>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 09:17:02 +0100
From: Stefan Eichenberger <eichest@...il.com>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.orgg, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
	piyush.mehta@....com, michal.simek@....com
Cc: francesco.dolcini@...adex.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger@...adex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: usb: microchip,usb5744: Remove peer-hub as
 requirement

Hi Greg,

On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:35:05AM +0100, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
> From: Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger@...adex.com>
> 
> The peer-hub is used to model the relationship between the USB 2 and USB
> 3 hub. However, it is possible to only connect USB 2 without having
> USB 3. Therefore, the peer-hub property should not be marked as required.

I just wanted to ask if everything is okay with the patch and if its
fine to apply it or if it needs some updates?

Regards,
Stefan