linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: usb: microchip,usb5744: Remove peer-hub as requirement

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 09:40:48 +0000
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Stefan Eichenberger <eichest@...il.com>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, piyush.mehta@....com, michal.simek@....com,
	francesco.dolcini@...adex.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger@...adex.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: usb: microchip,usb5744: Remove peer-hub as
 requirement

On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 09:17:02AM +0100, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 08:35:05AM +0100, Stefan Eichenberger wrote:
> > From: Stefan Eichenberger <stefan.eichenberger@...adex.com>
> > 
> > The peer-hub is used to model the relationship between the USB 2 and USB
> > 3 hub. However, it is possible to only connect USB 2 without having
> > USB 3. Therefore, the peer-hub property should not be marked as required.
> 
> I just wanted to ask if everything is okay with the patch and if its
> fine to apply it or if it needs some updates?

That was only 10 days ago, please give us a chance to catch up on
reviews.

In the meantime, while waiting, please review other changes on the
lists, that way yours moves higher up in the queue.  Any reason why you
can't do that now?

thanks,

greg k-h