lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 08:30:30 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sporadic regmap unit test failure in raw_sync

On 2/9/24 02:14, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 10:17:02PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 2/8/24 14:10, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
>>> I guess it's possible that we randomly generated the same value for the
>>> initial and modified values here?
> 
>> I think the diffs below should fix the problem. Would that do, or do you
>> have a better idea ?
> 
> Something like that, perhaps not that specific diff.  There's a bunch of
> tests that might be impacted as well so probably a helper would make

You are correct, though, unless I am missing something, those other cases
will result in wrongly passed tests, not wrongly failed tests. Not that
this is really better, but in a way it is less severe since that will also
only happen with the same low probability.

> sense here if nothing else, I should be able to take a look today or
> tomorrow.

Sounds good.

Thanks,
Guenter


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ