[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZcZepsPXCbmBnv0j@finisterre.sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 17:19:34 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sporadic regmap unit test failure in raw_sync
On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 08:30:30AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 2/9/24 02:14, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Something like that, perhaps not that specific diff. There's a bunch of
> > tests that might be impacted as well so probably a helper would make
> You are correct, though, unless I am missing something, those other cases
> will result in wrongly passed tests, not wrongly failed tests. Not that
> this is really better, but in a way it is less severe since that will also
> only happen with the same low probability.
Yes, on further inspection the other tests don't care what the value
they're replacing is which isn't ideal.
> > sense here if nothing else, I should be able to take a look today or
> > tomorrow.
> Sounds good.
I've got a patch in CI now which fixes the failures and adds the helper,
I'll go back later and ensure that the other attempts to change actually
do change the values.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists