lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 17:01:12 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Subhajit Ghosh <subhajit.ghosh@...aklogic.com>, Lars-Peter Clausen
 <lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>, Andy Shevchenko
 <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Anshul
 Dalal <anshulusr@...il.com>, Javier Carrasco
 <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>, Matt Ranostay <matt@...ostay.sg>, Stefan
 Windfeldt-Prytz <stefan.windfeldt-prytz@...s.com>,
 linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] dt-bindings: iio: light: adps9300: Add property
 vdd-supply

On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 08:33:11 +0100
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:

> On 08/02/2024 11:40, Subhajit Ghosh wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> > 
> > On 8/2/24 18:47, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:  
> >> On 06/02/2024 14:00, Subhajit Ghosh wrote:  
> >>> Add vdd-supply property which is valid and useful for all the
> >>> devices in this schema.  
> >>
> >> Why is it useful? How is it useful? DT describes the hardware, not
> >> because something is "useful".  
> > I am adding this property based on a previous review:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240121153655.5f734180@jic23-huawei/  
> 
> The property was there already.
> 
> > 
> > Does the below commit message in this context make sense to you?
> > "Add vdd-supply property for all the devices in this schema."  
> 
> It's still poor. You should say why, e.g. because devices have it.

I'd change the patch title to:

dt-bindings: iio: light: adps9300: Add missing vdd-supply

For description something simple like:

All devices covered by the binding have a vdd supply.


> 
> >>  
> >>>
> >>> this patch depends on patch:
> >>> "dt-bindings: iio: light: Merge APDS9300 and APDS9960 schemas"  
> >>
> >> This is unrelated and does not make any sense in commit msg. Drop.  
> > Apologies for the silly questions:
> > What does the "Drop" signify? Are you asking me to drop/delete the above
> > "...patch depends..." message or does it have any other meaning?  
> 
> Drop entire paragraph.
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ