[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240210170258.17fd1099@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 17:02:58 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Subhajit Ghosh <subhajit.ghosh@...aklogic.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen
<lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, Anshul
Dalal <anshulusr@...il.com>, Javier Carrasco
<javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>, Matt Ranostay <matt@...ostay.sg>, Stefan
Windfeldt-Prytz <stefan.windfeldt-prytz@...s.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] dt-bindings: iio: light: adps9300: Update
interrupt definitions
On Thu, 8 Feb 2024 21:23:09 +1030
Subhajit Ghosh <subhajit.ghosh@...aklogic.com> wrote:
> On 8/2/24 18:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 06/02/2024 14:00, Subhajit Ghosh wrote:
> >> Include irq.h and irq level macro in the example for readability
> >>
> >> this patch depends on patch:
> >> "dt-bindings: iio: light: Add property vdd-supply"
> >
> > Please, don't write such useless dependencies. This is neither true nor
> > useful.
> Understood.
Just for reference:
If there were such a dependency (beyond noise in the diff) then there is
still no need to state it when the patches are in the same series.
Jonathan
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> >
> Thank you for reviewing.
> Regards,
> Subhajit Ghosh
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists