lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240209184556.00cde1a2@hermes.local>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 18:45:56 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel
 Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
 Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Eduard Zingerman
 <eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song
 <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP
 Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo
 <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Jamal Hadi Salim
 <jhs@...atatu.com>, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko
 <jiri@...nulli.us>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, bpf@...r.kernel.org
 (open list:BPF [GENERAL] (Safe Dynamic Programs and Tools)),
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/sched: actions report errors with
 extack

On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 18:31:33 -0800
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 9 Feb 2024 15:58:30 -0800 Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > I mean that NL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK() should be more than enough by itself.
> > > We have full TC specs in YAML now, we can hack up a script to generate
> > > reverse parsing tables for iproute2 even if you don't want to go full
> > > YNL.    
> > 
> > Ok, then will take the err msg across all places using NL_REQ_ATTR_CHECK?  
> 
> Take _out_ ? That'd be great, yup.


I don't think that is actually a good idea because new kernel needs to still
report errors to older userspace iproute2.

This is kind of academic hair splitting, iproute2 doesn't send these kind
of missing part messages. It is more from test suites, or from custom
user programs; found this when looking at DPDK device driver that was
sending its own netlink.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ