linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] hugetlb: fix CONFIG_PADATA dependency for non-SMP system

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <2B59E906-4CC9-4926-A893-4954587D3BCD@linux.dev>
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2024 10:45:35 +0800
From: Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>
To: Gang Li <gang.li@...ux.dev>, jane.chu@...cle.com,
 Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>, steffen.klassert@...unet.com
Cc: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@...edance.com>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
 kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] hugetlb: fix CONFIG_PADATA dependency for non-SMP system


CC Jane, Daniel Jordan, Steffen as well in this thread.

> On Feb 8, 2024, at 10:39, Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Feb 5, 2024, at 16:08, Gang Li <gang.li@...ux.dev> wrote:
>> 
>> On 2024/2/5 15:37, Muchun Song wrote:
>>> Actually, I did not get it. Why the above code cannot work? The above
>>> code already make it serialized in one call, right? What do I miss here?
>>> Thanks.
>> 
>> PADATA consists of two distinct functionality:
>> 
>> One part is `padata_do_multithreaded`, which disregards
>> order and simply divides tasks into several groups for parallel
>> execution. My patch use `padata_do_multithreaded`.
> 
> OK. Since all users of PADATA of non-SMP case currently only use padata_do_multithreaded, it’s possible and easy to implement a variant of that in non-SMP case. It is not necessary to implement another functionality unless the only user of crypto/pcrypt.c does not depend on SMP in the future, at least now it’s dependent on SMP.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>> 
>> The other part is composed of a set of APIs that, while handling data in
>> an out-of-order parallel manner, can eventually return the data with
>> ordered sequence. Only `crypto/pcrypt.c` use them. I guess these APIs
>> are designed specifically for `crypto/pcrypt.c`.
>> ```
>> padata_alloc
>> padata_alloc_shell
>> padata_do_parallel
>> padata_do_serial
>> padata_free_shell
>> padata_free
>> ```