linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] RISC-V: enable rust

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72=VBFvB9O9c84YxpBBftpfNnnXx-+Xes0h8h6rN3EN5pA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 20:11:21 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Ramon de C Valle <rcvalle@...gle.com>
Cc: Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, 
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, 
	Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, 
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>, 
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, 
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev, 
	Matthew Maurer <mmaurer@...gle.com>, Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/2] RISC-V: enable rust

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 8:02 PM Ramon de C Valle <rcvalle@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry for the late reply. Sami might be the best person to answer this, but KCFI (not CFI) tests are lowered by passes that are architecture specific (see https://reviews.llvm.org/D119296), so we'd need to add support for RISC-V. There is no additional work required in the Rust compiler besides enabling it for the new target.

Thanks a lot Ramon!

Then for RISC-V let's go for the `depends on` for the moment, and we
can remove when the support lands for RISC-V (ideally when someone has
managed to boot it at least under some configuration).

Cheers,
Miguel