linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] swiotlb-xen: remove redundant NULL check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2402121528340.1925432@ubuntu-linux-20-04-desktop>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:29:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
To: Daniil Dulov <d.dulov@...ddin.ru>
cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, 
    Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, 
    Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, 
    Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>, 
    Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>, 
    xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, 
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb-xen: remove redundant NULL check

Hi Daniil,

Against which Linux branch was this patch generated?

Cheers,

Stefano


On Sun, 11 Feb 2024, Daniil Dulov wrote:
> In this case hwdev cannot be NULL, so remove redundant NULL check.
> 
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.
> 
> Fixes: b097186fd29d ("swiotlb-xen: SWIOTLB library for Xen PV guest with PCI passthrough.")
> Signed-off-by: Daniil Dulov <d.dulov@...ddin.ru>
> ---
>  drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> index 2b385c1b4a99..b166f6efea26 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ xen_swiotlb_alloc_coherent(struct device *hwdev, size_t size,
>  	if (!ret)
>  		return ret;
>  
> -	if (hwdev && hwdev->coherent_dma_mask)
> +	if (hwdev->coherent_dma_mask)
>  		dma_mask = hwdev->coherent_dma_mask;
>  
>  	/* At this point dma_handle is the dma address, next we are
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>