[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Zcogl6tqbMdQldKA@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:43:51 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Ralf Schlatterbeck <rsc@...tux.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Robin van der Gracht <robin@...tonic.nl>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: auxdisplay: hit, hd44780: drop
redundant GPIO node
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:38:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/02/2024 12:58, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
..
> Anyway, binding examples should not be collection of unrelated
> solutions, because then we should accept for each device schema several
> other variations and combinations.
Is this documented?
In any case, you would need to amend your series one way or another.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists