[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZcofhWb8stiddmru@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:39:17 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Robin van der Gracht <robin@...tonic.nl>,
Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: auxdisplay: hit,hd44780: drop redundant
GPIO node
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 09:34:24AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Examples of other nodes, like GPIO controller, are redundant and not
> really needed in device bindings.
..
> - i2c {
> - #address-cells = <1>;
> - #size-cells = <0>;
>
> - pcf8574: pcf8574@27 {
> - compatible = "nxp,pcf8574";
> - reg = <0x27>;
> - gpio-controller;
> - #gpio-cells = <2>;
> - };
> - };
In patch 3 you updated the lines that have lost their sense due to this one.
And I agree with others, please leave this example in place.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists