linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: auxdisplay: hit, hd44780: drop redundant GPIO node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240213161905.GA1459669-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 10:19:05 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ralf Schlatterbeck <rsc@...tux.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Robin van der Gracht <robin@...tonic.nl>,
	Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: auxdisplay: hit, hd44780: drop
 redundant GPIO node

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:59:02PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12/02/2024 14:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:38:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> >> On 12/02/2024 12:58, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> >> Anyway, binding examples should not be collection of unrelated
> >> solutions, because then we should accept for each device schema several
> >> other variations and combinations.
> > 
> > Is this documented?
> 
> Yes, writing schema says what the example is. We repeated it multiple
> times on multiple reviews, we made multiple commits multiple times and I
> briefly mentioned it also in my talks.

While yes, this is the guidance, I think this case has provided enough 
justification to keep it. Let's move on please.

Rob