linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: auxdisplay: hit, hd44780: drop redundant GPIO node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZcucO8R8ZOtR38jl@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 18:43:39 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
	Ralf Schlatterbeck <rsc@...tux.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Robin van der Gracht <robin@...tonic.nl>,
	Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: auxdisplay: hit, hd44780: drop
 redundant GPIO node

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:19:05AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:59:02PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On 12/02/2024 14:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:38:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > >> On 12/02/2024 12:58, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:

..

> > >> Anyway, binding examples should not be collection of unrelated
> > >> solutions, because then we should accept for each device schema several
> > >> other variations and combinations.
> > > 
> > > Is this documented?
> > 
> > Yes, writing schema says what the example is. We repeated it multiple
> > times on multiple reviews, we made multiple commits multiple times and I
> > briefly mentioned it also in my talks.
> 
> While yes, this is the guidance, I think this case has provided enough
> justification to keep it. Let's move on please.

Thank you, Rob.

Krzysztof, can you send v2, I'll apply it to the tree?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko