linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: auxdisplay: hit, hd44780: drop redundant GPIO node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d4337a53-8f4b-4782-8ce1-b0e4d7893e28@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 10:57:35 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Ralf Schlatterbeck <rsc@...tux.com>,
 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Robin van der Gracht
 <robin@...tonic.nl>, Paul Burton <paulburton@...nel.org>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: auxdisplay: hit, hd44780: drop redundant
 GPIO node

On 13/02/2024 17:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 10:19:05AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:59:02PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 12/02/2024 14:43, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 02:38:27PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 12/02/2024 12:58, Ralf Schlatterbeck wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>>>>> Anyway, binding examples should not be collection of unrelated
>>>>> solutions, because then we should accept for each device schema several
>>>>> other variations and combinations.
>>>>
>>>> Is this documented?
>>>
>>> Yes, writing schema says what the example is. We repeated it multiple
>>> times on multiple reviews, we made multiple commits multiple times and I
>>> briefly mentioned it also in my talks.
>>
>> While yes, this is the guidance, I think this case has provided enough
>> justification to keep it. Let's move on please.
> 
> Thank you, Rob.
> 
> Krzysztof, can you send v2, I'll apply it to the tree?

Sure.

Best regards,
Krzysztof