[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240214125819.GA1299735@ziepe.ca>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 08:58:19 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Shivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@...ux.ibm.com>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
npiggin@...il.com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
aneesh.kumar@...nel.org, naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com,
jroedel@...e.de, tpearson@...torengineering.com, aik@....com,
bgray@...ux.ibm.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
gbatra@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, vaibhav@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/iommu: Fix the missing iommu_group_put() during
platform domain attach
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 11:53:20PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> > Thanks for the patch. Applied this patch and verified and issue is fixed.
> >
> > This issue way originally reported in the below mail.
> >
> > https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=170737160630106&w=2
>
> Please use lore for links, in this case:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/274e0d2b-b5cc-475e-94e6-8427e88e271d@linux.vnet.ibm.com/
Also if you are respinning you may prefer this
@@ -1285,14 +1285,15 @@ spapr_tce_platform_iommu_attach_dev(struct iommu_domain *platform_domain,
struct device *dev)
{
struct iommu_domain *domain = iommu_get_domain_for_dev(dev);
- struct iommu_group *grp = iommu_group_get(dev);
struct iommu_table_group *table_group;
+ struct iommu_group *grp;
int ret = -EINVAL;
/* At first attach the ownership is already set */
if (!domain)
return 0;
+ grp = iommu_group_get(dev);
if (!grp)
return -ENODEV;
Which is sort of why this happened in the first place :)
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists