linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sparx5: Add spinlock for frame transmission from CPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 07:09:08 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
 <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>, <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
 <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
 <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
 <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sparx5: Add spinlock for frame
 transmission from CPU

On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:14:42 +0100 Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > Any reason you targeted 'net-next' rather than 'net', as this appears to
> > be clearly a bug fix here?  
> 
> Yes, it is a bug but it is not something that happens all the
> time and I thought this fits more into the lines of 'This could be a
> problem ...' therefore I had targeted 'net-next'.
> But if you consider that I should target 'net' instead of 'net-next' I
> can do that.

Definitely a bug fix worthy of net, yes, please.