linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sparx5: Add spinlock for frame transmission from CPU

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:07:42 +0100
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
	<Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>, <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	<rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>, <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
	<jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, <yuehaibing@...wei.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: sparx5: Add spinlock for frame
 transmission from CPU

The 02/14/2024 07:09, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 09:14:42 +0100 Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > > Any reason you targeted 'net-next' rather than 'net', as this appears to
> > > be clearly a bug fix here?
> >
> > Yes, it is a bug but it is not something that happens all the
> > time and I thought this fits more into the lines of 'This could be a
> > problem ...' therefore I had targeted 'net-next'.
> > But if you consider that I should target 'net' instead of 'net-next' I
> > can do that.
> 
> Definitely a bug fix worthy of net, yes, please.

Perfect, I will do that.

> 

-- 
/Horatiu