linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/23] KVM: arm64: Improvements to LPI injection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zc5wxKnqHomScT2f@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 20:15:00 +0000
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/23] KVM: arm64: Improvements to LPI injection

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 03:37:45PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > I'd really like to de-risk the performance changes from the cleanups, as
> > I'm convinced they're going to have their own respective piles of bugs.
> > 
> > How does that sound?
> 
> Yup, I'd be on board with that. If you can respin the first part with
> bugs fixed and without the stats, that'd be great. We can further
> bikeshed on the rest in the 6.10 time frame.

Cool. That makes things much easier to manage. I'll respin the get / put
improvements shortly, and hopefully this time I actually fix the stupid
lock imbalance :)

> Also please Cc: Eric Auger, as he dealt with a lot of the ITS
> save/restore stuff.

Always happy to designate another victim to review my crap.

-- 
Thanks,
Oliver