[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e3814f2c-0aa1-48e7-8122-e2c5154a3f0c@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 14:15:58 -0600
From: "Naik, Avadhut" <avadnaik@....com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yazen.ghannam@....com,
Avadhut Naik <avadhut.naik@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86/MCE: Add command line option to extend MCE Records
pool
On 2/12/2024 03:32, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 09:58:01AM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> * Can you think of a slick deduplication scheme instead of blindly
>> raising the buffer size?
>
> And here's the simplest scheme: you don't extend the buffer. On
> overflow, you say "Buffer full, here's the MCE" and you dump the error
> long into dmesg. Problem solved.
>
Wouldn't this require logging in the #MC context?
We would know that the genpool is full in mce_gen_pool_add() which, I
think is executed in #MC context.
> A slicker deduplication scheme would be even better, tho. Maybe struct
> mce.count which gets incremented instead of adding the error record to
> the buffer again. And so on...
>
--
Thanks,
Avadhut Naik
Powered by blists - more mailing lists