[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE-0n52qgKrasAw1AbZ97zMk1xz6P4KkxNLi4cBpNKy5wWu+1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 16:35:15 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Pin-yen Lin <treapking@...omium.org>, cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180-trogdor: Make
clamshell/detachable fragments
Quoting Doug Anderson (2024-02-13 15:34:38)
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 11:10 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > + * Copyright 2024 Google LLC.
> > + */
> > +
>
> Tiny nit: should this file have a comment like "/* This file must be
> included after sc7180-trogdor.dtsi */" like the clamshell file?
I was copying the comment for the keyboard include file, but the
detachable doesn't have that include. I can add it here though, that's
fine.
>
>
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor.dtsi
> > index e9f213d27711..c3fd6760de7a 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-lazor.dtsi
> > @@ -5,8 +5,7 @@
> > * Copyright 2020 Google LLC.
> > */
> >
> > -/* This file must be included after sc7180-trogdor.dtsi */
> > -#include <arm/cros-ec-keyboard.dtsi>
> > +#include "sc7180-trogdor-clamshell.dtsi"
>
> nit: Not that it was terribly consistent before, but in lazor you
> remove the "This file must be included after sc7180-trogdor.dtsi"
> because (I guess) it moved to the clamshell file. However, in other
> dts files you don't remove it. pazquel has the exact same comment and
> it's not removed. Pompom has a slight variant of the comment where it
> explains the reason (to modify cros_ec) and it's not removed. Could
> make it more consistent...
Sure I can make it more consistent with the explanation. Which way to go
though? Remove it from the boards and put it into the fragment files?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists