linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 21/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180-trogdor: Make clamshell/detachable fragments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=XAcXs1hmJB_Rd42+Q3gQDuw=2L+igCyWnnnSYtqdifPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 16:39:45 -0800
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
	Pin-yen Lin <treapking@...omium.org>, cros-qcom-dts-watchers@...omium.org, 
	Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, 
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/22] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180-trogdor: Make
 clamshell/detachable fragments

Hi,

On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 4:35 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> > > -/* This file must be included after sc7180-trogdor.dtsi */
> > > -#include <arm/cros-ec-keyboard.dtsi>
> > > +#include "sc7180-trogdor-clamshell.dtsi"
> >
> > nit: Not that it was terribly consistent before, but in lazor you
> > remove the "This file must be included after sc7180-trogdor.dtsi"
> > because (I guess) it moved to the clamshell file. However, in other
> > dts files you don't remove it. pazquel has the exact same comment and
> > it's not removed. Pompom has a slight variant of the comment where it
> > explains the reason (to modify cros_ec) and it's not removed. Could
> > make it more consistent...
>
> Sure I can make it more consistent with the explanation. Which way to go
> though? Remove it from the boards and put it into the fragment files?

I don't care too much. I guess I'd lean toward just putting it in the
fragment files just to copy it fewer times.

-Doug