linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: uapi: clarify default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMRc=MdrkCp2xMq4_Qa3i-tMNUL0=x8ubSRgGjRJHWPzw3=KAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 08:46:03 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, andy@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: uapi: clarify default_values being logical

On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 2:07 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 06:14:21PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> > The documentation for default_values mentions high/low which can be
> > confusing, particularly when the ACTIVE_LOW flag is set.
> >
> > Replace high/low with active/inactive to clarify that the values are
> > logical not physical.
> >
> > Similarly, clarify the interpretation of values in struct gpiohandle_data.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
>
> Just checking where we are at with this patch, given you've merged the
> two documentation patches that followed on from it.
>
> I realize you have bigger fish to fry at the moment, so sorry for any
> distraction, but I just want to ensure there isn't something you are
> expecting from me or it hasn't fallen through the cracks.
>
> Cheers,
> Kent.

Now queued. I had skimmed through the discussion and was under the
impression that you'll be sending a v2 of this one, sorry.

Bart