linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] gpio: uapi: clarify default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240215010733.GA30995@rigel>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 09:07:33 +0800
From: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
To: brgl@...ev.pl
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linus.walleij@...aro.org, andy@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: uapi: clarify default_values being logical

On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 06:14:21PM +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> The documentation for default_values mentions high/low which can be
> confusing, particularly when the ACTIVE_LOW flag is set.
>
> Replace high/low with active/inactive to clarify that the values are
> logical not physical.
>
> Similarly, clarify the interpretation of values in struct gpiohandle_data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>

Just checking where we are at with this patch, given you've merged the
two documentation patches that followed on from it.

I realize you have bigger fish to fry at the moment, so sorry for any
distraction, but I just want to ensure there isn't something you are
expecting from me or it hasn't fallen through the cracks.

Cheers,
Kent.