linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 02/10] bpf/helpers: introduce sleepable timers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51b1ae50-161f-435e-afe0-6d11f2cfbfc6@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 08:58:33 -0800
From: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@...il.com>
To: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>,
 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau
 <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
 Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
 KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
 Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
 Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
 Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next v2 02/10] bpf/helpers: introduce sleepable
 timers



On 2/14/24 09:18, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> +static void bpf_timer_work_cb(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + struct bpf_hrtimer *t = container_of(work, struct bpf_hrtimer, work);
> + struct bpf_map *map = t->map;
> + void *value = t->value;
> + bpf_callback_t callback_fn;
> + void *key;
> + u32 idx;
> +
> + BTF_TYPE_EMIT(struct bpf_timer);
> +
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + callback_fn = rcu_dereference(t->sleepable_cb_fn);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + if (!callback_fn)
> + return;
> +
> + /* FIXME: do we need any locking? */
> + if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY) {
> + struct bpf_array *array = container_of(map, struct bpf_array, map);
> +
> + /* compute the key */
> + idx = ((char *)value - array->value) / array->elem_size;
> + key = &idx;
> + } else { /* hash or lru */
> + key = value - round_up(map->key_size, 8);
> + }
> +
> + /* FIXME: this crashes the system with
> + * BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000000b
> + */
> + /* callback_fn((u64)(long)map, (u64)(long)key, (u64)(long)value, 0, 0); */
> + /* The verifier checked that return value is zero. */
> +}
> +
>   static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct bpf_hrtimer *, hrtimer_running);
>   
>   static enum hrtimer_restart bpf_timer_cb(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
>   {
>   	struct bpf_hrtimer *t = container_of(hrtimer, struct bpf_hrtimer, timer);
> + bpf_callback_t callback_fn, sleepable_cb_fn;
>   	struct bpf_map *map = t->map;
>   	void *value = t->value;
> - bpf_callback_t callback_fn;
>   	void *key;
>   	u32 idx;
>   
>   	BTF_TYPE_EMIT(struct bpf_timer);
> + sleepable_cb_fn = rcu_dereference_check(t->sleepable_cb_fn, 
> rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
> + if (sleepable_cb_fn) {
> + schedule_work(&t->work);
It seems nothing to stop the timer from being free here, right?

You should have a way to make sure the timer & programs here is
still alive when the work is running. For example, it can be flags
to indicate the work is scheduled to prevent the timer from releasing,
and indicate the timer should be free when returning from the callback.

> + goto out;
> + }
> +
>   	callback_fn = rcu_dereference_check(t->callback_fn, rcu_read_lock_bh_held());
>   	if (!callback_fn)