[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <82463a28-822b-4612-aed5-1be21c13acf4@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 19:09:43 +0200
From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
To: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: Write ITAPDLY for DDR52 timing
On 7/02/24 03:15, Judith Mendez wrote:
> For DDR52 timing, DLL is enabled but tuning is not carried
> out, therefore the ITAPDLY value in PHY CTRL 4 register is
> not correct. Fix this by writing ITAPDLY after enabling DLL.
>
> Fixes: a161c45f2979 ("mmc: sdhci_am654: Enable DLL only for some speed modes")
Note that the Fixes tags make a different ordering
than the patch order i.e.
Patch Fixes in version
1 13ebeae68ac9 v5.10-rc1
2 a161c45f2979 v5.7-rc1
3 8ee5fc0e0b3b v5.7-rc1
4 8ee5fc0e0b3b v5.7-rc1
4 a0a62497f6aa v5.10-rc1
5 fe52e2fbc6ef v5.9-rc1
6 1accbced1c32 v5.3-rc1
7 a161c45f2979 v5.7-rc1
That might make backporting these patches more challenging.
> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@...com>
> ---
> Changelog:
> v1->v2:
> - Call sdhci_am654_write_itapdly() in sdhci_am654_set_clock()
> instead of sdhci_am654_setup_dll()
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
> index 2c66a965c225..b50db5d4a452 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ static void sdhci_am654_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>
> if (timing > MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25 && clock >= CLOCK_TOO_SLOW_HZ) {
> sdhci_am654_setup_dll(host, clock);
> + sdhci_am654_write_itapdly(sdhci_am654, sdhci_am654->itap_del_sel[timing]);
> sdhci_am654->dll_enable = true;
> } else {
> sdhci_am654_setup_delay_chain(sdhci_am654, timing);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists