[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ratkc4fo3mqwuzsbxsiwq54jclnarnjl3x7ts64elx6hguvbay@ihelujsnzd6i>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2024 16:40:21 +0100
From: Ondřej Jirman <megi@....cz>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "usb: typec: tcpm: reset counter when enter into
unattached state after try role"
On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 04:32:54PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 08:33:50PM +0100, Ondřej Jirman wrote:
> > From: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
> >
> > The reverted commit makes the state machine only ever go from SRC_ATTACH_WAIT
> > to SNK_TRY in endless loop when toggling. After revert it goes to SRC_ATTACHED
> > after initially trying SNK_TRY earlier, as it should for toggling to ever detect
> > the power source mode and the port is again able to provide power to attached
> > power sinks.
> >
> > This reverts commit 2d6d80127006ae3da26b1f21a65eccf957f2d1e5.
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c | 3 ---
> > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > See https://lore.kernel.org/all/odggrbbgjpardze76qiv57mw6tllisyu5sbrta37iadjzwamcv@qr3ubwnlzqqt/
> > for more.
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> > index f7d7daa60c8d..295ae7eb912c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tcpm/tcpm.c
> > @@ -3743,9 +3743,6 @@ static void tcpm_detach(struct tcpm_port *port)
> > if (tcpm_port_is_disconnected(port))
> > port->hard_reset_count = 0;
> >
> > - port->try_src_count = 0;
> > - port->try_snk_count = 0;
> > -
> > if (!port->attached)
> > return;
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> >
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
> a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
> to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
> writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
> created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
> in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
> kernel tree.
>
> You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
> as indicated below:
>
> - Your patch does not have a Signed-off-by: line. Please read the
> kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst and resend
> it after adding that line. Note, the line needs to be in the body of
> the email, before the patch, not at the bottom of the patch or in the
> email signature.
>
>
> If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
> how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
> Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
> from other developers.
It's a mechanically generated revert of upstream patch. It has no authorship.
I did not write it, machine did. :)
But I can add a sign off for the commit message I made:
Signed-of-by: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
kind regards,
o.
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h's patch email bot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists