[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1f7fa75e-f920-47d8-ae4f-cc7595b5e732@kernel.dk>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2024 05:45:15 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Xiaobing Li <xiaobing.li@...sung.com>
Cc: asml.silence@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org, kun.dou@...sung.com, peiwei.li@...sung.com,
joshi.k@...sung.com, kundan.kumar@...sung.com, wenwen.chen@...sung.com,
ruyi.zhang@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] io_uring: Statistics of the true utilization of sq
threads.
On 2/17/24 10:55 PM, Xiaobing Li wrote:
> On 2/6/24 10:39 AM, Xiaobing Li wrote:
>> io_uring/fdinfo.c | 8 ++++++++
>> io_uring/sqpoll.c | 8 ++++++++
>> io_uring/sqpoll.h | 1 +
>> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/io_uring/fdinfo.c b/io_uring/fdinfo.c
>> index 976e9500f651..18c6f4aa4a48 100644
>> --- a/io_uring/fdinfo.c
>> +++ b/io_uring/fdinfo.c
>> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ __cold void io_uring_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *f)
>> unsigned int sq_shift = 0;
>> unsigned int sq_entries, cq_entries;
>> int sq_pid = -1, sq_cpu = -1;
>> + u64 sq_total_time = 0, sq_work_time = 0;
>> bool has_lock;
>> unsigned int i;
>>
>> @@ -147,10 +148,17 @@ __cold void io_uring_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *f)
>>
>> sq_pid = sq->task_pid;
>> sq_cpu = sq->sq_cpu;
>> + struct rusage r;
>> +
>> + getrusage(sq->thread, RUSAGE_SELF, &r);
>> + sq_total_time = r.ru_stime.tv_sec * 1000000 + r.ru_stime.tv_usec;
>> + sq_work_time = sq->work_time;
>> }
>>
>> seq_printf(m, "SqThread:\t%d\n", sq_pid);
>> seq_printf(m, "SqThreadCpu:\t%d\n", sq_cpu);
>> + seq_printf(m, "SqTotalTime:\t%llu\n", sq_total_time);
>> + seq_printf(m, "SqWorkTime:\t%llu\n", sq_work_time);
>> seq_printf(m, "UserFiles:\t%u\n", ctx->nr_user_files);
>> for (i = 0; has_lock && i < ctx->nr_user_files; i++) {
>> struct file *f = io_file_from_index(&ctx->file_table, i);
>> diff --git a/io_uring/sqpoll.c b/io_uring/sqpoll.c
>> index 65b5dbe3c850..9155fc0b5eee 100644
>> --- a/io_uring/sqpoll.c
>> +++ b/io_uring/sqpoll.c
>> @@ -251,6 +251,9 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
>> }
>>
>> cap_entries = !list_is_singular(&sqd->ctx_list);
>> + struct rusage start, end;
>> +
>> + getrusage(current, RUSAGE_SELF, &start);
>> list_for_each_entry(ctx, &sqd->ctx_list, sqd_list) {
>> int ret = __io_sq_thread(ctx, cap_entries);
>>
>> @@ -260,6 +263,11 @@ static int io_sq_thread(void *data)
>> if (io_run_task_work())
>> sqt_spin = true;
>>
>> + getrusage(current, RUSAGE_SELF, &end);
>> + if (sqt_spin == true)
>> + sqd->work_time += (end.ru_stime.tv_sec - start.ru_stime.tv_sec) *
>> + 1000000 + (end.ru_stime.tv_usec - start.ru_stime.tv_usec);
>> +
>> if (sqt_spin || !time_after(jiffies, timeout)) {
>> if (sqt_spin)
>> timeout = jiffies + sqd->sq_thread_idle;
>> diff --git a/io_uring/sqpoll.h b/io_uring/sqpoll.h
>> index 8df37e8c9149..e99f5423a3c3 100644
>> --- a/io_uring/sqpoll.h
>> +++ b/io_uring/sqpoll.h
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ struct io_sq_data {
>> pid_t task_pid;
>> pid_t task_tgid;
>>
>> + u64 work_time;
>> unsigned long state;
>> struct completion exited;
>> };
>
> Hi, Jens and Pavel
> This patch has been modified according to your previous opinions.
> Do you have any other comments?
I don't have any further complaints on the patch, I think it looks
pretty straight forward now. I'll get it applied, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists