linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] udmabuf: Fix a potential (and unlikely) access to unallocated memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 18:59:02 +0100
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
Cc: gustavo@...eddedor.com, keescook@...omium.org,
 Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>, Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
 Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
 Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] udmabuf: Fix a potential (and unlikely) access to
 unallocated memory

Le 19/02/2024 à 09:37, Dan Carpenter a écrit :
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2024 at 06:46:44PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> If 'list_limit' is set to a very high value, 'lsize' computation could
>> overflow if 'head.count' is big enough.
>>
> 
> The "list_limit" is set via module parameter so if you set that high
> enough to lead to an integer overflow then you kind of deserve what
> you get.
> 
> This patch is nice for kernel hardening and making the code easier to
> read/audit but the real world security impact is negligible.

Agreed.

That is what I meant by "and unlikely".
Maybe the commit message could be more explicit if needed.

Let me know if ok as-is or if I should try to re-word the description.

CJ

> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
> 
>