linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] drm/ci: mediatek: Add job to test panfrost and powervr GPU driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2083520a-13f3-0ecd-45ce-ee4ba34d5bca@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:09:30 +0530
From: Vignesh Raman <vignesh.raman@...labora.com>
To: Helen Koike <helen.koike@...labora.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Cc: daniel@...ishbar.org, airlied@...il.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
 david.heidelberg@...labora.com, guilherme.gallo@...labora.com,
 sergi.blanch.torne@...labora.com, robdclark@...il.com,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] drm/ci: mediatek: Add job to test panfrost and
 powervr GPU driver

Hi Helen,

On 09/02/24 23:51, Helen Koike wrote:
> 
> 
> On 30/01/2024 12:03, Vignesh Raman wrote:
>> For mediatek mt8173, the GPU driver is powervr and for mediatek
>> mt8183, the GPU driver is panfrost. So add support in drm-ci to
>> test panfrost and powervr GPU driver for mediatek SOCs and update
>> xfails. Powervr driver was merged in linux kernel, but there's no
>> mediatek support yet. So disable the mt8173-gpu job which uses
>> powervr driver.
>>
>> Add panfrost specific tests to testlist and skip KMS tests for
>> panfrost driver since it is not a not a KMS driver. Also update
>> the MAINTAINERS file to include xfails for panfrost driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raman <vignesh.raman@...labora.com>
> 
> Hi Vignesh, thanks for your work.
> 
> I'm still wondering about a few things, please check below.
> 
>> ---
>>
>> v2:
>>    - Add panfrost and PVR GPU jobs for mediatek SOC with new xfails, 
>> add xfail
>>      entry to MAINTAINERS.
> 
> Maybe we should review how the xfails failes are named. I think they 
> should start with the DRIVER_NAME instead of GPU_VERSION.
> 
> For instance, consider the following job:
> 
> mediatek:mt8183-gpu:
>    extends:
>      - .mt8183
>    variables:
>      GPU_VERSION: mediatek-mt8183-gpu
>      DRIVER_NAME: panfrost
> 
> And we have mediatek-mt8183-gpu-skips.txt
> 
> If there is an error, we want to notify the panfrost driver maintainers 
> (and maybe not the mediatek driver maintainers), so MAINTAINERS file 
> doesn't correspond to this.

Agree.

> 
> How about a naming <driver name>_<hardware/gpu>_<type: gpu/display> ?
> 
> powervr_mediatek-mt8173_gpu-skipts.txt
> mediatek_mediatek-mt8173_display-skipts.txt
> panfrost_mediatek-mt8183_gpu-skips.txt
> mediatek_mediatek-mt8183_display-skips.txt
> ...
> 
> What do you think?

Yes we can keep this naming. In this case do we still need gpu/display 
in the xfails file name?

Regards,
Vignesh