linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: dw_mmc: add support for hi3798mv200

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <956ebf94-62ef-4e67-893e-86586a980883@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 13:27:09 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Yang Xiwen <forbidden405@...look.com>, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
 Yang Xiwen via B4 Relay <devnull+forbidden405.outlook.com@...nel.org>,
 Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, Jaehoon Chung
 <jh80.chung@...sung.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, Igor Opaniuk <igor.opaniuk@...aro.org>,
 tianshuliang <tianshuliang@...ilicon.com>, David Yang <mmyangfl@...il.com>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: dw_mmc: add support for hi3798mv200

On 18/02/2024 09:21, Yang Xiwen wrote:
> On 2/18/2024 4:03 PM, kernel test robot wrote:
>> Hi Yang,
>>
>> kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on 8d3dea210042f54b952b481838c1e7dfc4ec751d]
>>
>> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yang-Xiwen-via-B4-Relay/mmc-dw_mmc-add-support-for-hi3798mv200/20240216-014744
>> base:   8d3dea210042f54b952b481838c1e7dfc4ec751d
>> patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240216-b4-mmc-hi3798mv200-v1-1-7d46db845ae6%40outlook.com
>> patch subject: [PATCH 1/3] mmc: dw_mmc: add support for hi3798mv200
>> config: parisc-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240218/202402181540.H4Ose96P-lkp@intel.com/config)
>> compiler: hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240218/202402181540.H4Ose96P-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
>>
>> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
>> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
>> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402181540.H4Ose96P-lkp@intel.com/
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>     drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-hi3798mv200.c: In function 'dw_mci_hi3798mv200_init':
>>>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-hi3798mv200.c:178:36: error: passing argument 1 of 'mmc_of_parse_clk_phase' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types]
>>       178 |         mmc_of_parse_clk_phase(host->dev, &priv->phase_map);
>>           |                                ~~~~^~~~~
>>           |                                    |
>>           |                                    struct device *
>>     In file included from drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-hi3798mv200.c:11:
>>     include/linux/mmc/host.h:542:46: note: expected 'struct mmc_host *' but argument is of type 'struct device *'
>>       542 | void mmc_of_parse_clk_phase(struct mmc_host *host,
>>           |                             ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~
>>     cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>>
>>
>> vim +/mmc_of_parse_clk_phase +178 drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-hi3798mv200.c
>>
>>     168	
>>     169	static int dw_mci_hi3798mv200_init(struct dw_mci *host)
>>     170	{
>>     171		struct dw_mci_hi3798mv200_priv *priv;
>>     172		struct device_node *np = host->dev->of_node;
>>     173	
>>     174		priv = devm_kzalloc(host->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
>>     175		if (!priv)
>>     176			return -ENOMEM;
>>     177	
>>   > 178		mmc_of_parse_clk_phase(host->dev, &priv->phase_map);
> 
> Please note that this patch is depending on another patch[1].
> 
> [1]: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mmc/ae876e697ba16ba2925ec217c6b4e3d8ffea4ab3.camel@codeconstruct.com.au/T/#t
> 

You did not provide any links to dependencies in cover letter nor in
patch changelog. You included on purpose, which is nice and correct, the
base commit:

	base-commit: 8d3dea210042f54b952b481838c1e7dfc4ec751d

which does not include above commit apparently.

How anyone can guess it and test your patches?

Please send with proper dependencies marked.

Best regards,
Krzysztof