[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <042ab32c-666e-44f7-8ba1-db9a82f351d1@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2024 15:54:11 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Russ Weight <russ.weight@...ux.dev>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Dent Project <dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 14/17] dt-bindings: net: pse-pd: Add bindings
for PD692x0 PSE controller
> Mmh not sure we want to support broken cases that does not follow the spec.
> Should we?
We should specify the properties a device following the spec should
use. These are the common properties we expect all devices should be
using.
Broken devices can however have additional properties, defined in
their own binding. And if we see a pattern for broken properties, we
could pull them out into a -broken.yaml binding, which the broken
devices could share.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists