Message-ID: <CAK9=C2XQVnoEEzjwnb7ZSM90vbdTU=9yteAYXOhbkSoDcEGnKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 22:03:31 +0530
From: Anup Patel <apatel@...tanamicro.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, 
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Björn Töpel <bjorn@...nel.org>, 
	Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>, Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>, 
	Sunil V L <sunilvl@...tanamicro.com>, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>, 
	Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/13] irqchip: Add RISC-V incoming MSI controller
 early driver

On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 6:45 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 20 2024 at 11:37, Anup Patel wrote:
> > The RISC-V advanced interrupt architecture (AIA) specification
> > defines a new MSI controller called incoming message signalled
> > interrupt controller (IMSIC) which manages MSI on per-HART (or
> > per-CPU) basis. It also supports IPIs as software injected MSIs.
> > (For more details refer https://github.com/riscv/riscv-aia)
> >
> > Let us add an early irqchip driver for RISC-V IMSIC which sets
> > up the IMSIC state and provide IPIs.
>
> s/Let us add/Add/

Okay, I will update.

>
> > +#else
> > +static void imsic_ipi_starting_cpu(void)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void imsic_ipi_dying_cpu(void)
> > +{
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __init imsic_ipi_domain_init(void)
> > +{
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
>
> Please condense this into
>
> static void imsic_ipi_starting_cpu(void) { }
> static void imsic_ipi_dying_cpu(void) { }
> static int __init imsic_ipi_domain_init(void) { return 0; }
>
> No point in wasting space for these stubs.

Sure, I will update.

>
> > + * To handle an interrupt, we read the TOPEI CSR and write zero in one
> > + * instruction. If TOPEI CSR is non-zero then we translate TOPEI.ID to
> > + * Linux interrupt number and let Linux IRQ subsystem handle it.
> > + */
> > +static void imsic_handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
> > +{
> > +     struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> > +     int err, cpu = smp_processor_id();
> > +     struct imsic_vector *vec;
> > +     unsigned long local_id;
> > +
> > +     chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> > +
> > +     while ((local_id = csr_swap(CSR_TOPEI, 0))) {
> > +             local_id = local_id >> TOPEI_ID_SHIFT;
> > +
> > +             if (local_id == IMSIC_IPI_ID) {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>
>         if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))

Okay, I will update.

>
> > +                     ipi_mux_process();
> > +#endif
> > +                     continue;
> > +             }
>
> > +
> > +/* MUST be called with lpriv->lock held */
>
> Instead of a comment which cannot be enforced just have
>
>         lockdep_assert_held(&lpriv->lock);
>
> right at the top of the function. That documents the requirement and
> lets lockdep yell if not followed.
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +static void imsic_local_timer_callback(struct timer_list *timer)
> > +{
> > +     struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv = this_cpu_ptr(imsic->lpriv);
> > +     unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +     raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lpriv->lock, flags);
> > +     __imsic_local_sync(lpriv);
> > +     raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpriv->lock, flags);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* MUST be called with lpriv->lock held */
>
> Ditto
>
> > +static void __imsic_remote_sync(struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv, unsigned int cpu)
>
> > +void imsic_vector_mask(struct imsic_vector *vec)
> > +{
> > +     struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv;
> > +
> > +     lpriv = per_cpu_ptr(imsic->lpriv, vec->cpu);
> > +     if (WARN_ON(&lpriv->vectors[vec->local_id] != vec))
> > +             return;
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(), no?
>
> > +bool imsic_vector_isenabled(struct imsic_vector *vec)
> > +{
> > +     struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv = per_cpu_ptr(imsic->lpriv, vec->cpu);
> > +     unsigned long flags;
> > +     bool ret;
> > +
> > +     raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lpriv->lock, flags);
> > +     ret = vec->enable;
> > +     raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpriv->lock, flags);
>
> I'm not sure what you are trying to protect here. vec->enable can
> obviously change right after the lock is dropped. So that's just a
> snapshot, which is not any better than using
>
>           READ_ONCE(vec->enable);
>
> and a corresponding WRITE_ONCE() at the update site, which obviously
> needs serialization.
>
> > +static void __init imsic_local_cleanup(void)
> > +{
> > +     int cpu;
> > +     struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv;
>
>         struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv;
>         int cpu;
>
> Please.
>
> > +void imsic_state_offline(void)
> > +{
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +     struct imsic_local_priv *lpriv = this_cpu_ptr(imsic->lpriv);
> > +#endif
>
> You can move that into the #ifdef below.
>
> > +     unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > +     raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&imsic->matrix_lock, flags);
> > +     irq_matrix_offline(imsic->matrix);
> > +     raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&imsic->matrix_lock, flags);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +     raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&lpriv->lock, flags);
> > +     WARN_ON_ONCE(try_to_del_timer_sync(&lpriv->timer) < 0);
> > +     raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lpriv->lock, flags);
> > +#endif
> > +}
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>         tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists