[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9281dd01-d20e-4eed-96ae-6aa63c9eb678@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:42:18 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
antoniu.miclaus@...log.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
jdelvare@...e.com
Cc: linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
Ibrahim Tilki <Ibrahim.Tilki@...log.com>,
Zeynep Arslanbenzer <Zeynep.Arslanbenzer@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] drivers: rtc: add max313xx series rtc driver
On 2/19/24 14:18, Chris Packham wrote:
> From: Ibrahim Tilki <Ibrahim.Tilki@...log.com>
>
> Adding support for Analog Devices MAX313XX series RTCs.
>
Adding -> Add
The subject should really be something like "rtc: max31335: Add support
for additional chips", with details in the patch description.
All those (in my opinion unnecessary) function, data structure,
and variable renames makes it really difficult to review the code.
I don't see the point of that, so please don't expect any further
feedback about the hwmon changes from me.
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists