[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h6i2iwwr.fsf@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:38:28 -0800
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, luto@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, willy@...radead.org,
mgorman@...e.de, jpoimboe@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
jgross@...e.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, bristot@...nel.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de, anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com,
mattst88@...il.com, krypton@...ich-teichert.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
David.Laight@...LAB.COM, richard@....at, mjguzik@...il.com,
jon.grimm@....com, bharata@....com, raghavendra.kt@....com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
Ankur Arora
<ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/30] entry: handle lazy rescheduling at user-exit
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 12 2024 at 21:55, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> The scheduling policy for TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY is to allow the
>> running task to voluntarily schedule out, running it to completion.
>>
>> For archs with GENERIC_ENTRY, do this by adding a check in
>
> Please write out architectures. This is not twatter.
Thankfully not! Will fix (this and elsewhere).
>> exit_to_user_mode_loop().
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
--
ankur
Powered by blists - more mailing lists