linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/30] thread_info: selector for TIF_NEED_RESCHED[

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 14:50:18 -0800
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, paulmck@...nel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, luto@...nel.org, bp@...en8.de,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org, willy@...radead.org,
        mgorman@...e.de, jpoimboe@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        jgross@...e.com, andrew.cooper3@...rix.com, bristot@...nel.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
        glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de, anton.ivanov@...bridgegreys.com,
        mattst88@...il.com, krypton@...ich-teichert.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        David.Laight@...LAB.COM, richard@....at, mjguzik@...il.com,
        jon.grimm@....com, bharata@....com, raghavendra.kt@....com,
        boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
        Ankur Arora
 <ankur.a.arora@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/30] thread_info: selector for TIF_NEED_RESCHED[_LAZY]


Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> writes:

> On Mon, Feb 12 2024 at 21:55, Ankur Arora wrote:
>>
>> +#define TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY_OFFSET (TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY - TIF_NEED_RESCHED)
>> +
>> +typedef enum {
>> +	NR_now = 0,
>> +	NR_lazy = 1,
>
> Just a nitpick. Please don't camel case the constant. Can you please
> write out NEED_RESCHED_* as NR is generally associated with number?

That's a good point. But,

__set_tsk_need_resched(NEED_RESCHED_LAZY/_NOW), or
__tif_need_resched(NEED_RESCHED_LAZY/_NOW) seems a little repetitive.
Plus, there's the risk of confusing it with the TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY
flag.

How about, something like this?

 +typedef enum {
 +	RESCHED_NOW = 0,
 +	RESCHED_LAZY = 1,
 +} resched_t;

Still, not ideal. But I think it's an improvement over those two.


Thanks

--
ankur