lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:43:27 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Jingyi Wang <quic_jingyw@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: kernel@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document sm8650p soc and
 AIM500 AIoT board

On 20/02/2024 09:55, Jingyi Wang wrote:
> 
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On 2/5/2024 8:33 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 05/02/2024 12:57, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>>> Document Qualcomm SM8650P SoC and AIM500 AIoT board.
>>
>> Please describe shortly what is SM8650P and what are the differences
>> with SM8650.
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <quic_jingyw@...cinc.com>
>>> ---
>>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 9 +++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>>> index 1999a5f2f254..e87ceb42853b 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml
>>> @@ -88,11 +88,13 @@ description: |
>>>          sm8450
>>>          sm8550
>>>          sm8650
>>> +        sm8650p
>>>          x1e80100
>>>  
>>>    The 'board' element must be one of the following strings:
>>>  
>>>          adp
>>> +        aim500-aiot
>>
>> Drop this line.
>>
> drop this line will cause fail dt binding check failure, any suggestion on that?

Really? How?



Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ